November 2004

You are currently browsing the monthly archive for November 2004.

Here’s a link to Rachel’s site where she has a posting with a link through to an article about her experiences on building online communties via blogging NZ Idol. See: » Another stint in the media cre8d design - journal.

Russell Brown wrote the article in the Listener and I read and listen to his stuff online (Public Address | Hard News), in print (Wide Area News | New Zealand Listener) and on the radio (Mediawatch) most weeks. Don’t always agree with him but there’s often some good stuff there to get you thinking.

Recent article on the relationship between faith and politics “across the ditch” in Australia : TIME Pacific Magazine: Christian Soldiers — Nov. 29, 2004.

It must be Auckland

Gale force winds, hail and rain. Then five minutes later clear blue skies before a repeat of the rain. Must be Auckland 4-5 days before summer officially starts. Hoping all the roof tiles stay on tonight.

Just heard a guy from this being interviewed on the radio. Sounds like an excellent way to get some relevant community programming - and they do the hard work of actually making it. See Open Door.

The Open Door project gives access to TV3 Network television to selected individuals and groups of New Zealanders.

If you’re involved in an issue, a cause or an activity that you want people to know about, you can apply to make your own television documentary.

Here’s a clip - Activism - they made on what it means to be an activist in NZ.

Just working through Elaine Graham’s paper Bioethics after Posthumanism: Natural Law, Communicative Action and the Problem of Self-Design for a second time. Some good, thought provoking material there. For example,

Socio-economic inequalities may thus represent as profound a threat to human dignity as biotechnologies.

I think this gets forgotten in all the heated discussions. That some who are vehemently anti-biotechnology, especially in focusing on defending the sanctity of the (abstract) individual, don’t see that technological practices they do approve of may be discriminating against whole communities already in existence. That those people’s human dignity and value as persons is being denied.

I’m also pondering her question,

But does our concept of human nature have to be fixed and immutable in order to have moral substance?

Depending on your view of the image and likeness of God in human beings different answers might be given.

Wired News: U.N. Deadlocks on Cloning Ban

Tied up with this is the ongoing debate about is a “human life” different from a “human being”.

Italy’s proposal asks member states to “prohibit any attempts at the creation of human life through cloning processes and any research intended to achieve that aim.”

Human life tends to be a broader definition including early embryoic life, rather than human being which is often seen as a narrower definition.

Eelman

Went for a walk a day or so ago around Paremuka Lakeside Reserve which is about 5-10 minutes walk from home. My back’s been sore so I’ve been taking breaks from essay marking and rewriting my current article and walking around the neighbourhood. Today my youngest and I walked down to the public library for preschool storytime which was a good workout as it’s uphill all the way back pushing the pushchair.

Anyway at one end of Paremuka reserve is this sculpture - Eel Man. Spent a bit of time just by the water looking at it and thinking about the artist’s intention with it. The artist, Warren Viscoe, writes,

The references are restorative, the act of restocking and replenishing that which is fragile and timeless. The eel could be described as a conduit between people and the natural world. The physical and metaphorical journey it signals traces a passage inward and outward, to the hinterland and to the remote reaches of the ocean.

Certainly I found it restorative and will be walking that way regularly. Will try and get a better photo.

Inside my head today

It’s getting pretty crowded in here.

Barbour, Ian G. Ethics in an Age of Technology: The Gifford Lectures 1989-1991. Vol. 2. San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco, 1993.



Bostrom, Nick. The Transhumanist FAQ : A General Introduction. Version 2.1. World Transhumanist Association, October 2003. Accessed 1 November 2004. Available from http://transhumanism.org/resources/FAQv21.pdf.



Forrester, Duncan B. "The Scope of Public Theology." Studies in Christian Ethics 17, no. 2 (2004): 5-19.



________. "Social Justice and Welfare." In The Cambridge Companion to Christian Ethics, ed. Robin Gill, 195-208. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. Reprint, 2002.



Graham, Elaine. "Bioethics after Posthumanism : Natural Law, Communicative Action and the Problem of Self-Design." Ecotheology 9, no. 2 (2004): 178-198.



Goethals, Gregor T. The Electronic Golden Calf : Image, Religion, and the Making of Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Cowley Publications, 1990.



Peters, Ted. "Human Cloning : Religious Responses." In Human Cloning : Religious Responses, ed. Ronald Cole-Turner, 12-24. Louisville, Ky.: Westminster John Knox Press, 1997.



White, Susan J. Christian Worship and Technological Change. Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1994.

S5: A Simple Standards-Based Slide Show System.

For simple, clean presentations that you might want to put both on the web and a kiosk it looks like a good starting point. (None of the Powerpoint for Web bloat).

Via Tim@SansBlogue

How odd. Somehow I never thought I’d come across Rick Warren while reading a science and religion editorial. See: Science & Theology News - Editorial: The universe, and our lives, on purpose. So far the most surprising thing today.

I read Duncan Forrester’s essay “Social Justice and Welfare” this week. (In The Cambridge Companion to Christian Ethics, ed. Robin Gill, 195-208. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.) While reading it I was struck by two passaged he quoted. The first was American Lutheran theologian Ronald Thiemann,

Because we know that God will remain faithful to his promises, we are liberated from the devastating fear that the accomplishment of justice in the world depends solely upon our efforts. The primacy and priority of God’s grace frees us from the self-defeating effort of seeking our salvation in the quest for justice. Since our salvation has been secured by Christ’s death and resurrection, we are now free to seek justice for the neighbor in need…We seek justice freely, because we have been freely justified.

and the second from Methodist Stanley Hauerwas,

The task of the church [is] to pioneer those institutions and practices that the wider society has not learned as forms of justice. (At times it is also possible that the church can learn from society more just ways of forming life.) The church, therefore, must act as a paradigmatic community in the hope of providing some indication of what the world can be but is not…The church does not have, but rather is, a social ethic. That is, she is a social ethic inasmuch as she functions as a criteriological institution - that is, an institutions that has learned to embody the form of truth that is charity as revealed in the person and work of Christ.

Forrester asks the following questions which I’ve been mulling over as I think about my own church community.

But how is the church a social ethic, how does it ‘pioneer new institutions and practices’, how does it function as ‘a paradigmatic community’ demonstrating and exemplifying the justice of God?

Still thinking about these questions and will be for a long time, I think.

Forrester also has an interesting essay online “Politics and Vision” where he talks about the nature of social visions within a pluralistic society, the importance of symbolism and Christian engagement with and appropriation of visions. (PDF | Word)

The End of Suburbia?

Just caught the end of the review of this on the radio (National Radio - advance to 48 minutes) of THE END OF SUBURBIA which sounded interesting. From the film’s web site

Suburbia, and all it promises, has become the American Dream.

But as we enter the 21st century, serious questions are beginning to emerge about the sustainability of this way of life. With brutal honesty and a touch of irony, The End of Suburbia explores the American Way of Life and its prospects as the planet approaches a critical era, as global demand for fossil fuels begins to outstrip supply. World Oil Peak and the inevitable decline of fossil fuels are upon us now, some scientists and policy makers argue in this documentary.

I see that there’s a public screening next Monday put on by the Green Party here in Auckland (details here).

Does anyone know anything about it?

Great day

Had an amazing day today with lots of friends who came around for a day long gathering (11am through to the last people leaving around 9pm). No special reason - just time for friends and their families to come, share some food and drink and catch up with each other and meet some new people. The weather came to the party with a warm, sunny day so the kids could play with water ourside as well as getting in some cricket.

Lots of fun, lots of laughter and lots of special people. Not to mention the odd glass of “Black Brute” and “Old Thumper” beers from the heart of Waitakere, mussels on the BBQ for dinner courtesy of Andrew & Ingrid, and some of Lynette’s excellent chocolate cake.

Big thanks to Fromonts (Leamington) and Graham C (Pirongia) who tripped all the way up from the Waikato for the day as well as to all the other “locals” who came too.

Kim and I thoroughly enjoyed ourselves (as did our kids) and are now somewhat exhausted (but in a nice way).

[Late Addition] How could I have forgotten Mark Forman’s poetry readings (and pretty good Sam Hunt intonation reading Hunt’s “Porirua Friday Night”).

Following up the last posting these are a couple of responses to Ted Peter’s perspective.

Clarifying Christian Concerns - Randy Maddox, Ph.D.: In Response to Ted Peters.
Science and Beneficence - Cynthia Fitch, Ph.D.: In Response to Ted Peters.

Came across this today while trawling some blogs I visit on an irregular basis. Paradoxology: Is Our DNA Sacred? has some commentary and some interesting third party comments on Lutheran theologian Ted Peter’s perspective on cloning and stem cell research. (See Response: The Seattle Pacific University Magazine - Summer 2004 | Volume 26, Number 7 | Features - Is Our DNA Sacred?)

I’m currently reading Ted Peter’s essay “Cloning Shock - A Theological Reaction.” (In Human Cloning : Religious Responses, ed. Ronald Cole-Turner, 12-24. Louisville, Ky.: Westminster John Knox Press, 1997.) as I work on an article on Christian social justice and technology so it was good to get another insight into the thought of someone who has a more nuanced approach to biotechnology than the “Just say ‘No!’” crowd. Not that I would agree with all he says but he is right to note that the issues surrounding biotechnology generate a range of religious responses.

The Guardian has the summary of a new report from The Lancet citing 100,000 civilian casualities in Iraq. Possibly more if Falluja is included (the radio today suggested up to 200,000). Violent death is now the biggest cause of death in Iraq. See Guardian Unlimited | Special reports | 100,000 Iraqi civilians dead, says study and the full Lancet reports at: The Journal : Current Issue.

It seems for some people I know this doesn’t count as a “moral issue”. If it isn’t then I don’t know what is.

Science & Theology News - News: Dembski to head seminary’s faith-and-science center

The man who has become both figurehead and lightning rod for the intelligent design movement in America recently agreed to direct a science-and-religion center at one of the nation’s most conservative Protestant seminaries.

William Dembski, a philosopher of science, was hired in September to head Southern Baptist Theological Seminary’s new Center for Science and Theology. Dembski’s appointment will begin when the center opens June 1 at the Louisville, Ky., school.

Should be interesting. Dembski ruffled a few feathers at Baylor and, I imagine, will do the same here.

For those of you who don’t know what Dembski and co propose as “Intelligent Design” have a look here: (Intelligent Design Topic : Introduction and History Topic : Intelligence Design. One of the most common places to see ID is in the Focus on the Family video Unlocking the Mystery of Life.

Personally, I don’t think ID in it’s best case scenario goes beyond asserting theism (or even deism in some cases) - a form of general revelation. In fact, it can become another system tainted by “God of the gaps” thinking.

When Dembski was in NZ a year or two back I asked him what could sit under ID - was it exclusively a 6-day creation type position? Basically he said anything theistic can sit under it - theistic evolutionism, progressive creationist as well as the creation science (6-day) crowd.

Busy weekend

Very busy weekend for all of us. Multiple birthday parties for friends, a farewell dinner, a triva competition plus all the normal weekend stuff.

chris-marshall.jpg Friday night Kim and I attended a farewell dinner for Chris Marshall at BCNZ. After 19 years of teaching NT studies at BCNZ Chris is heading off to Victoria University in Wellingon to be the St John’s Senior Lecturer in Christian Theology. Chris has been hugely influential in encouraging me with my studies - both as a student of his and as a colleague for a year. Always time to talk and offer sage advice, as well as bringing a fresh perpective to the NT - linking it with the real world. (Here’s an article he wrote a while back on Following Christ in Life: The Anabaptist-Mennonite Tradition). Good food, good company and some good speechs from Tim, Jo, Mark and Monica. Tim’s reference in his speech to Chris’ linking of worship to research was very true. We wish Chris and his family all the best for the new venture.
Read the rest of this entry »