Comments on: Sente for references? http://www.greenflame.org/2006/08/27/sente-for-references/ Jottings on science, religion, technology, pop culture and faith from the Antipodes. Wed, 04 Jan 2012 19:53:18 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Stephen http://www.greenflame.org/2006/08/27/sente-for-references/comment-page-1/#comment-560 Stephen Wed, 13 Sep 2006 12:01:35 +0000 http://www.greenflame.org/wordpress/2006/08/27/sente-for-references/#comment-560 Good point. The connectivity options with EndNote work reasonably well, particularly it you have access not only to the library catalogues of your own institutions, but also other databases and catalogues. (Having said that, EndNote crashed and burned today when attempting to connect to an online catalogue.) Handling of electronic references is one thing that does seem clumsy in EndNote, though that may also be limitations attached to the citation styles required. Good point.

The connectivity options with EndNote work reasonably well, particularly it you have access not only to the library catalogues of your own institutions, but also other databases and catalogues. (Having said that, EndNote crashed and burned today when attempting to connect to an online catalogue.)

Handling of electronic references is one thing that does seem clumsy in EndNote, though that may also be limitations attached to the citation styles required.

]]> By: Christos Efstathiou http://www.greenflame.org/2006/08/27/sente-for-references/comment-page-1/#comment-559 Christos Efstathiou Wed, 13 Sep 2006 00:53:03 +0000 http://www.greenflame.org/wordpress/2006/08/27/sente-for-references/#comment-559 I like it for its ability to organize PDF libraries much better than Endnote. It does not offer connection to the Web of Science, making it tough to deal with scientific projects (Pubmed search is working though...) It still has some future in it... especially if it's about to catch up with Endnote I like it for its ability to organize PDF libraries much better than Endnote. It does not offer connection to the Web of Science, making it tough to deal with scientific projects (Pubmed search is working though…)
It still has some future in it… especially if it’s about to catch up with Endnote

]]>