<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More on bibliography software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.greenflame.org/2008/01/22/more-on-bibliography-software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.greenflame.org/2008/01/22/more-on-bibliography-software/</link>
	<description>Jottings on science, religion, technology, pop culture and faith from the Antipodes.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 19:53:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.greenflame.org/2008/01/22/more-on-bibliography-software/comment-page-1/#comment-3522</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenflame.org/2008/01/22/more-on-bibliography-software/#comment-3522</guid>
		<description>Yes, I saw Zotero has some PDF handling software in the preferences screen. Haven&#039;t had much chance to play with that feature yet though - given the huge number of PDF files on my disk though that would be a good feature.

Of course, that sort of indexing/search capacity is only as good as the type of PDF being analyzed. Some journals still seem to produce a PDF of scanned pages of a journal - each page is an image - which would mean that there would be an additional OCR step needed, perhaps.

As I&#039;m in flux as I start my new academic appointment over what platform I&#039;ll be working on for writing etc. maybe the portability of Zotero across software platforms is the way to go. Maybe I&#039;ll give Mellel and Bookends or Sente a go and see how they work. Always good to see what else is out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I saw Zotero has some PDF handling software in the preferences screen. Haven&#8217;t had much chance to play with that feature yet though &#8211; given the huge number of PDF files on my disk though that would be a good feature.</p>
<p>Of course, that sort of indexing/search capacity is only as good as the type of PDF being analyzed. Some journals still seem to produce a PDF of scanned pages of a journal &#8211; each page is an image &#8211; which would mean that there would be an additional OCR step needed, perhaps.</p>
<p>As I&#8217;m in flux as I start my new academic appointment over what platform I&#8217;ll be working on for writing etc. maybe the portability of Zotero across software platforms is the way to go. Maybe I&#8217;ll give Mellel and Bookends or Sente a go and see how they work. Always good to see what else is out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scot Becker</title>
		<link>http://www.greenflame.org/2008/01/22/more-on-bibliography-software/comment-page-1/#comment-3519</link>
		<dc:creator>Scot Becker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 16:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenflame.org/2008/01/22/more-on-bibliography-software/#comment-3519</guid>
		<description>Zotero is also a very adept PDF manager, with full text search, tagging, and the ability to &#039;categorize&#039; PDFs/references in unlimited folders (according to workflow, library location, project, or whatever).  It slurps full-text articles from many sites (only those you otherwise have access to of course) automatically, with bibliographic info.  

It needs a few bits for full SBL style support, but it&#039;s on the move.  It has already surpassed Endnote in may ways, and might soon leave it entirely in the dust.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zotero is also a very adept PDF manager, with full text search, tagging, and the ability to &#8216;categorize&#8217; PDFs/references in unlimited folders (according to workflow, library location, project, or whatever).  It slurps full-text articles from many sites (only those you otherwise have access to of course) automatically, with bibliographic info.  </p>
<p>It needs a few bits for full SBL style support, but it&#8217;s on the move.  It has already surpassed Endnote in may ways, and might soon leave it entirely in the dust.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

