Sexy Syllabi and Theological Education?

This popped up in my Facebook feed the other day and reminded me that while we have spent a lot of time, money and resources on course structures, content, delivery and evaluation, and even what should be in a course outline or syllabus, the actual document is just plain (boring). It doesn’t really engage students the way we’d like them to do with the rest of the course.

See Extreme Makeover, Syllabus Edition « Tona Hangen for one attempt to address this.

This is something on my mind at the moment as I’ve been thinking a lot about theological education (and higher education in general) in the NZ setting. Piled up beside my bed and on my desk at the moment are the following books, each of which gives a view into theological education in various contexts:


“Revitalizing Practice” (Malcolm L. Warford, Mary E. Hess, Timothy C. Tennant, Joseph A. Bessler, Peter T. Cha)


“Uncovering Theology: the Depth, Reach and Utility of Australian Theological Education” (Charles Sherlock)


“Future of Christian Learning, The: An Evangelical and Catholic Dialogue” (Mark A. Noll, James Turner)


“English for Theology: A Resource for Teachers and Students (Dominican Series)” (Gabrielle Kelly)


“Transforming Theology: Student Experience and Transformative Learning in Undergraduate Theological Education” (Les Ball)

510Zz9BUWKL._SL160_.jpg
“Finding God at Harvard: Spiritual Journeys of Thinking Christians” (IVP Books)


“Quality Research Papers: For Students of Religion and Theology” (Nancy Jean Vyhmeister)


“Engaging Technology in Theological Education: All That We Can’t Leave Behind (Communication, Culture, and Religion)” (Mary E. Hess)

mc693.jpg
“A Genuinely Educated Ministry” : Three Studies on Theological Education in the Uniting Church of Australia (Andrew Dutney)

Any other suggestions

Pastors and/or PhDs?

James Harding posted the link below on Facebook yesterday which reminded me of a number of related articles recently discussing the relationship (or lack thereof) between higher education and pastoral/priestly vocations.

James linked to

The Consolation of Theology: Or Why We Need Scholar Priests | The Curate’s Desk.

Other related links to that article include:

And related to that

Some good questions here.

Writing Tools

Writing is not my default method for communication. I used to dread the start of the school terms because of the obligatory ‘write about what you did in the holidays’ essay. Words do not go onto paper easily for me. As Hemingway said, ‘There is nothing to writing. All you do is sit down at a typewriter and bleed.’

I’d rather diagram material, make lists, use maps, write programming code, and speak to people than write. However, over the years I’ve had to write quite a bit – various theses and dissertations, essays and articles, web pages, reports, letters and so on. Indeed, my writing is what I’m evaluated on in my occupation. It’s not easy for me, so along the years I’ve tried various tools and tricks to make it easier for me.

Word processors made it a little easier to write – I used VIEW on a borrowed BBC micro for a while, as well as a word processor on an Apple II, WordStar and WordPerfect under DOS, and then later when I got a Macintosh I used MacWrite, and for my MSc thesis I imported a copy of Nisus to use for that. I found ACTA on the Mac a helpful way to organize and plan writing, and I’ve used used MS Word in its various forms on Mac, DOS and Windows. My favourite version of Word was Mac Word 5.0 – it was quick, unencumbered by ‘features’ and was reasonably stable. It ran well on an old Powerbook 150 which was my writing tool of choice while doing my BD.

I’ve used other writing tools to assist – EndNote for bibliographic management, Inspiration for a bit, whiteboards, various bits of note-taking software, and my favourite keyboard for writing – the Microsoft Internet Keyboard Pro. These have all helped with the writing process, as have various approaches to breaking up writing projects, but writing is still hard work.

In the last few months I’ve inherited an old iPad and keyboard which I’ll be doing some writing on, and I’ve been looking around for software to that will help me with that. So here’s a few of what I’ve found useful in the process:

In the end I’ve end up installing a variety of things to try out but it looks like the core ones are going to be iaWriter for just blasting text out, Pages for the odd 1-2 pages of formatted text, Office2 HD for when I’m working on MS Word documents with comments and track-changes, and the Google Drive app (for Google Docs and HTML).

However, all of these might all disappear (or at least be used less frequently) from the iPad when the iPad version of Scrivener comes out. I’ve barely touched the surface of the Mac version of the app (or the PC version) but it’s broken my writer’s block on a number of projects, can integrate (after a fashion) with EndNote, and allows me to organize my documents and resources exactly how I like.

Writing is hard work, but the Scrivener software is the best thing I’ve found so far for how I work, and then I use Word etc. to make any minor changes etc. if required.

The Scrivener Facebook page is good for getting ideas on how to use it, and I was intrigued to see this idea there – How to Use Scrivener to Organise Your Bible Study | ChurchMag.

Citation Obsession?

It’s that time of year when a new crop of students arrive for this first semester, joining the others who are returning to continue or finish their degrees. And one of the first things that they’ll encounter in their course outlines and instructions for essays are will be guidelines about academic honesty and correct citation style for their written work.

Institutions invest a significant amount of resources (time, processes, tutoring, disciplinary actions, and print and web resources) on this – and there are some really good materials out there. For example, University of Auckland – Referencite.

That said, I have some sympathy with the sentiment expressed in this article, which argues that getting the exact form of citations right at the expense of developing critical engagement with material might be detrimental. Note that the article doesn’t say you don’t need citations or acknowledging sources, just that the quest for the perfectly formatted bibliography might take a back seat for a bit.

See: Citation Obsession? Get Over It! – Commentary – The Chronicle of Higher Education

Pondering Prezi

I quite like how Prezi can create a different perspective on a presentation, either as part of a person’s talk or as a standalone tool. But unless it’s done well it can be quite disorientating. Here are a couple of different presentations (just given for example, rather than as ‘good’ examples) I’ve seen recently that have me thinking about whether I might use it for teaching theology to people who are more ‘visually’ oriented that word-oriented.

And some postings commenting on Prezi as an tool in education

More at prezi.com

Knox Centre 2013 scholarships

Knox Centre 2013 scholarships

The Knox Centre for Ministry and Leadership is offering scholarships to Presbyterians doing part-time or full-time theological studies through Otago and Auckland Universities, Laidlaw College, Carey Baptist College and the EIDTS. Application deadline is 31 March. See the KCML website for information.

via Knox Centre 2013 scholarships | Presbyterian Church of Aotearoa New Zealand.

Technology, teaching and learning

Clearing out links that have been in the browser for a while. These ones relate to teaching and learning.

Learning Aloud – Videos are what students want and not what they need

and

Derek’s Blog » Thinking more about game-based learning
Post links through to some game-based learning blogs and sites, and has some comments on Minecraft (which my kids really seem to like).