Greenflame

Jottings on science, religion, technology, pop culture, photography and faith from the Aotearoa New Zealand

  • Article seen on the AdBusters web site about Republican attempts to mobilise support for Bush directly through church groups. (CultureJammers: Onward Christian Voter)

    The article comments,

    It’s no surprise that Bush is counting on the religious right to put him back in office, but how far is he willing to go? And since when is it okay for churches to engage in partisan activity?

    Define “partisan”? Does that mean the church cannot express a view on any issue at all. Some of Jesus’ teachings seem pretty partisan to me. The main point in the article seems to be that if you’re seen to be polically partisan you lose your tax-free charitable status. Couldn’t that be seen as a bribe?

  • Funny sort of a day today. Asked to speak at the School of Theology postgrad seminar on my experiences at the ANZATS conference in Melbourne last month and on participating in the uni postgrad poster expo/competion last year. Sort of felt like a “what did you do in the holidays?” school project.

    This year it looks like there’ll be more scope for posters outside of the science/engineering fields so hopefully there will be more theologians out there wanting to get involved with this year’s poster expo. Got very wet going to give the talk as I had to park a long way off campus even though I’d added in extra time to find a park. Dripped my way through the talks.

    Also had to complete and hand in my annual PhD review today. It was good to do – I’ve been thinking that progress is slow but when I started writing down all the stuff I’ve done (conferences, papers, expos, chapters etc.) I found it all quite encouraging.

    Nice to take time to look back and get some encouragement to go forward.

  • Even though I’ve been busy preparing theology lectures and generally stressing out being busy recently I’ve been reading these too.

    Just finished Alan Jamieson’s Journeying in Faith. To be honest I think I got more out of A Churchless Faith but as with that book the stories told by the various people interviewed were the highlight for me. I admit I found some of the middle chapters dragged a bit but the final chapter “Belonging In and Beyond the Church” will be one I will revisit. After reading it that was the section that I’d like to see expanded upon. (Triggering thoughts with Miroslav Volf’s “exclusion and embrace” motifs)

    Also on the bedside table are Stephen Baxter’s Evolution and David Slack’s Bullshit, Backlash and Bleeding Hearts: A confused person’s guide to The Great Race Row. Finding both stimulating reading.

    Also on the reading agenda are Evangelical Ecclesiology: Reality or Illusion? (The shift I perceive in some parts of evangelicalism away from a broad movement toward becoming a narrow “denomination” disturbs me) and The Dynamics of Human Life.

  • I’m in the process of reading the anthology Dark Matter : A Century of Speculative Fiction from the African Diaspora edited by Sheree R. Thomas. I’m finding it both enjoyable, confusing in places and extremely challenging all at the same time. There are short stories and essays in the collection.

    Derrick Bell’s short story “The Space Traders” (1992) has been my favourite so far. A story about an alien offer to the US for technology and resources to solve their financial, ecological and energy problems in exchange for all the African Americans living in the US. Some challenging material on the nature of democracy, business, government, racism, slavery and pragmatism in it.

    Samuel R. Delany’s essay “Racism and Science Fiction” (1999) is an interesting read too. (Maybe this was picked up by the Star Trek Deep Space 9 episode Far Beyond the Stars)

    If you have a chance track the collection down in the local library.

  • From David Slack’s web site a a short quiz about aspects of the Treaty of Waitangi.

    See A Question of Proportion: Questionnaire.

    At the end of it you can see how you rate against others who’ve done the quiz.

    Finally, a chance to prove that you really are the “expert” you proclaim to be in the tea room.

  • Interesting article on religious education in schools in NZ: With God on their side by Sally Blundell | New Zealand Listener

    Increasingly, New Zealanders are demanding that schools give their children religious instruction – especially as a way to teach values like trust and honesty. But is religious extremism
    being stopped at the school gates?

  • Interesting essay by Roz Picard at MIT on Does HAL Cry Digital Tears?

    Are emotions a desirable property for computers to have? It’s hard to imagine someday walking into a computer store and saying, “Give me the most emotional machine you’ve got.” After all, isn’t possessing the highest form of rationality one of the hallmarks of computers? Aren’t Mr. Spock and Data the unemotional patron saints of computer scientists? Imagine how a computer with emotion might work — perhaps it would have to feel interested before it would listen to what you have to tell it. On the face of it, emotions in computers sound absurd. After all, didn’t emotion cause HAL to malfunction?

  • Started teaching my part of Introduction to Christian Theology yesterday with the session entitled “Theology? Who needs it?!”.

    Spent a bit of time getting the class to get their feet wet by discussing in small groups the statement “To love is to know God.” I find getting the students to do something like this and then present their thoughts to the class is a good way to see how they approach theological thinking at the start of the course and what sources they use to do theology.

    It was the sources I was keen to get them to start thinking about for themselves. In a week or two we’ll look at the typical sources used in theology, such as scripture, tradition, reason and experience, and others like contemporary culture and art. Tradition is a hard source for many evangelical students to grasp (or even consider) but Maggi’s post tradition and traditionalism has given me some useful starting points to approach it. She says,

    But there’s another way of useing (sic) the word tradition. To appeal to tradition as a measure of authority and truth (…) places our efforts at expressing the truth of the gospel in our time and culture in the context of other efforts to do the same, in other times, and in other places.

    It’s nice to read blog entries that you feel carry a depth behind them.

    Also talked to the class about how I think everyone is a theologian of one sort or another. If you pray, think about the words of a song in church, hold a position that denies God’s existence or try a understand another’s faith you’re doing theology.

  • Following up on several of recent Steve’s postings on How do we go deep? here’s a crowd that claim to have recognised the lack of depth in the general media and blogging. Their alternative is to produce detail 5-20 page “manifestoes” to be copied, shared and transmitted across cyberspace with a view to soliciting comments and deeper thinking. They argue,

    In the Internet (and especially blogging), we see the glimpse of an alternative. Taken over time, many of the best blogs create a thoughtful, useful argument that actually teaches readers something.
    Alas, blogging is falling into the same trap as many other forms of media. The short form that works so well online attracts more readers than the long form. Worse, most blogs stake out an emotional position and then preach to the converted, as opposed to challenging people to think in a new way.

    I’ll be watching to see if it’s productive.

    See: ChangeThis.

  • A sobering opinion piece on torture and the process of developing torturers at: After Abu Ghraib, psychologist asks: Is it our nature to torture?.

    Philip G. Zimbardo says in it,

    I condemn all uses of torture, not only because of the suffering and moral degradation it causes, but also because it represents a corruption of the creative mind in the service of evil.

    Human beings are creative – it seems to be part of our nature and possibly, some argue, a product of being image-bearers of a creative God. Not only does torture corrupt that creativity within the torturer but it ultimately dehumanizes all parties involved. Expressing our human creativity serving evil strips us of our very humanity that creativity is part of.